The international legal edition International Tax Review conducted an annual research among experts (lawyers, attorneys at law, tax advisers) in the sphere of tax disputes’ resolution (Tax Controversy Leaders). Victor Sereda and Artem Sereda were recognized as the leading experts in the field of tax dispute resolution by the international legal edition International Tax Review (http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/IssueArticle/3745746/Supplements/Ukraine.html?supplementListId=98273).
allTax legal and tax advisers filed a lawsuit against the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine in the interests of one of the market’s leader in the logging and wood processing. The subject of the lawsuit is the land plot used by the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, covering an area of 269 hectares. The cost of the land is more than 10 million hryvnias.
The market’s leader in the production of spectrometers and equipment for the Nuclear Power Plant was faced with the refusal of the tax authorities to register tax invoice for a total amount of 2 million hryvnias. Having signed the contract and received an advance for the services, the market’s leader in the production of spectrometers and equipment for Nuclear Power Plants was unable to register tax invoices in the Unified Register of Tax Invoices.
A private client applied in 2010 to allTax legal and tax advisers regarding a dispute with FUIB Bank. Litigation between the Client-Debater and PJSC "FUIB" continued on collection of debts and foreclosure of mortgages from 2010. The amount of debt was more than 5.5 million hryvnias. The bank received an executive inscription of the notary and separately appealed to the court to recover the debt under the loan agreement.
Private Client applied to allTax legal and tax advisers regarding a dispute with Euroleasing Ukraine. The litigation concerned the invalidation of the Financial Lease Agreement. The amount of the dispute is 0, 5 million hryvnas.
Regarding one of the leaders in the agro-industrial sector of the economy, several lawsuits on collection of arrears under supply contracts for a total amount of more than 0.5 million hrivnas have been initiated. The supplier has appealed to Agrarsis with a lawsuit for debt’s collection for the delivered products, which, as explained the head of Agrarsis, was not actually delivered, and the delivery not for goods were falsified by an unscrupulous supplier.