allTax legal and tax advisers successfully defends the interests of a leader in the manufacture of zeolite in a court. The Court of the First Instance exact from the leader in the production of zeolite 0.3 million hrivnas as arrears and penalties according to the contract of supplement of the equipment.
allTax legal and tax advisers enterd in a labour dispute with Raiffeisen Leasing Aval regarding reinstatement one of the employees on its position and exacting the compensation for the compulsory absence from work. Court hearings few times were postponed in order to summon additional evidences and there delivery to the Court. Raiffeisen Lising Aval insisted that the dismissal was legal because that time there were no free vacant job for the employee which they could offer to a dismissed person.
allTax legal and tax advisers was recognized by the authoritative world edition Legal 500 EMEA (Europe, Middle East, Africa), as a legal company in tax practice. April 12, 2017 Legal 500 published an annual survey of the market of the legal services in the form of a rating of law firms. In the "Tax" category under "tier 3", allTax legal and tax advisers was recommended.
The authoritative edition "Legal Practice" published an annual ranking of law firms of Ukraine on November 26, 2016. The analysis of the companies held on the base of the number of companies’ employees; the experience of workers; the amount of transactions that accompanied law companies during the year; the amount of the income received by the companies; the income received by the employees of companies; another achievements of the companies.
A large enterprise which produces zeolite signed a contract with one of the enterprises of Kyiv region for the supplyment of the new equipment. When the equipment was supplied its bad-quality and discrepancy to the technical documents were found out. Some equipment was counterfeit. The amount of damages is 1, 5 mln. UAH.
Private investor signed an investing contract with a developer. The developer was unable to give to the investor documents for the ownership for a real estate object when the contract expired. As it turned out, the developer was in a difficult financial position and the company, which officially signed the investment contract was preparing for bankruptcy.